Work

Nest case study

A student studying late at night with a phone on an open notebook under blue light
// 01 Context

Students study at 1am.
Their tools were built for 1pm.

I studied for my own boards at this hour. Every tool I reached for - video calls, group chats, study apps - assumed someone had already arranged the session. None were built for the student who wants to start right now, with whoever's around.

9-2am

The window when competitive-exam students do the bulk of their studying.

68%

Report their primary study time falls after 9pm.

4-6h

Average daily study time during peak prep.

1 in 3

Sessions abandoned because an accountability partner couldn't be reached.

01

Coordination is the toll booth.

Every tool charges a coordination cost before you can study - get the link, agree a time, wait for replies. If it fails, you study alone.

02

Camera creates performance, not focus.

Being on camera meant tidying the room, sitting up straight, looking productive. The accountability mechanism produced anxiety instead.

03

The social layer was the wrong shape.

Tools were either fully structured (teacher schedules, students attend) or fully unstructured (a plain call). Nothing lightweight in between.

Scale explained why the problem mattered. The interviews showed where it actually broke: not during studying, but before the session could even begin. The market-size stats create context; the student conversations exposed the failure point.

Design diagnosis

The missing feature wasn't more tools. It was removing the dependency on other people's schedules.

Nest app on a study desk
// 02 Research

Four tools audited.
All four assumed the same thing.

One question throughout: what does each tool assume must already be true before you can start studying?

01

Secondary research

Lokniti-CSDS and ASER 2024 data on exam-prep behaviour in India - to size the market and confirm the device.

Rs 58kcr

India's private coaching industry - the infrastructure built around exam pressure.

EPW - Financial Express - 2024
7.1cr

Students enrolled in coaching classes - a parallel education system.

India Coaching Federation - 2024
57%

Of 14-16s with smartphone access use it for studying. The phone is the device.

ASER 2024 - Pratham
02

Competitor audit

Zoom, Meet, Unacademy, Discord - the tools students already reached for. The audit wasn't about features. It was about what each one needs to be true before it can open.

Assumption required Zoom Meet Unacademy Discord
A session time has been agreed
The group knows where to gather
The student is comfortable being visible
A study context exists before joining
Not required Partly Assumed

Read down any column and it's mostly amber. Every tool assumes the arrangement is already done. Zoom, Meet, Unacademy, and Discord solve the session layer, but they assume the hardest social work is complete: find people, align timing, share links, wait, remind, and restart momentum. The audit was not just that existing tools assume coordination. It was what that assumption costs: the student spends their limited willpower assembling the room before they can spend any of it studying.

03

Student conversations

Informal interviews on late-night habits, coordination failures, and camera discomfort.

"I'd spend 20 minutes in the group chat trying to get everyone online. Half the time I just gave up and watched YouTube."

JEE aspirant - Surat - 2023

"I always ended up cleaning my room before joining. Felt like I was performing instead of actually studying."

12th Board student - Nagpur - 2023

"I don't need my friends to be free. I just need to not feel like I'm studying alone at 1am."

12th Board student - Ahmedabad - 2023

"I still prefer studying with friends. I just wish it did not take so much work to get everyone there."

12th Board student - Pune - 2023

This mattered because Nest was not proving that friends were bad. It was proving that friends were fragile infrastructure.

Nest Join Rooms screen on a study desk
// 03 The Bet

One finding. One move.
One gamble.

The finding

Coordination is the barrier, not motivation.

Students were disciplined. They had the time, the intention, and a phone in hand. The blocker was always the same - needing other people online at the same moment.

The move

So I removed the thing every tool required: the arrangement.

No agreed time, no shared link, no waiting for friends. You walk into a room that's already live. Public rooms, full of strangers.

The catch

This trades a problem I'd solved for one I hadn't.

Friends were hard to coordinate. Strangers are hard to trust. So the rest of this product rests on a single bet - that a room full of strangers can do the work a friend couldn't. If that bet is wrong, Nest fails in a very specific way: a room full of people who are technically present but emotionally irrelevant. Attendance without accountability. A product that removes friends, but fails to replace the pressure they created.

Removing friends looks like a downgrade.
It's the opposite.

The inverse relationship Nest bets on The closer someone is to you, the less they hold you accountable - the opposite of what is commonly assumed. How hard they keep you focused What everyone assumes What Nest bets A stranger A close friend How well they know you →

At the stranger end the two lines are farthest apart and flipped. That gap is the entire product.

“The stranger who shows up at 1:00 AM grants no permission to stop.”

We designed for social friction over casual comfort to drive user completion:

  • 45 strangers Collective accountability that maintains study momentum.
  • 1 friend The easy opt-out that lets progress stall.
// 04 Strategy

One move.
Three consequences.

Remove the arrangement, and the rest of the product falls out of that single decision. Nothing here is a separate idea - each is what the move forces.

Paths I chose not to take.

Better friend scheduling

Made planning easier, but still depended on known people being free at the same time.

Reminders and availability nudges

Reduced forgetting, but did not solve reluctance, silence, or last-minute drop-off.

AI scheduling

Optimised the calendar, but not the social commitment needed to begin.

Friend-first rooms with public backup

Kept the familiar model, but treated strangers as a fallback instead of the core accountability mechanism.

The chosen move was not to make friends easier to coordinate. It was to remove friendship as the condition for starting.

Consequence 01

Public rooms replace the group chat.

You don't ask who's free. You walk into a room that's already live. The avatar stack and count do what the group chat used to - except 45 people already decided for you.

Before · existing tools After · Nest · Join Rooms
"Anyone free?"
No reply.
Group chat - 20 min wait
Friends offline
Session abandoned
Consequence 02

The camera becomes optional - out loud.

Every video tool opens by asking you to turn it on. Nest does the reverse, in the open. Made findable in settings, the choice is a concession. Put in the pre-join screen, it's the default - and a statement about what studying should feel like.

Before · existing tools After · Nest · Pre-Join Check
"Turn on
your camera."
Visible room - performative
Zoom meet default state
Every video call
Consequence 03

Presence without performance.

Open rooms, walk-in and walk-out, no history kept. The session timer and the live count create accountability without surveillance. You know others are there. No one is watching you specifically.

Before · existing tools After · Nest · In-Session
"Waiting
for host..."
Zoom - lobby screen
Session has not started
Nothing to do but wait
Nest app screens in context
// 05 Making

How it was built.

The build followed the product’s central bet: reduce the distance between wanting to study and entering a room that is already alive.

01 Information Architecture

I mapped Nest around intent, not administration. The primary path had to move from ‘I want to study’ to ‘I’m inside a room’ before scheduling, invites, or setup could slow the student down.

Pre-auth · Onboarding
Splash screen
→
Sign in / Sign up
→
OTP verification
→
Intent screen
→
enters app ↓
Join Room
"Who's studying right now?"
Browse rooms
→
Filter & search
→
Room detail
→
Pre-join check
→
In-session
↳
Search results
·
Participant list
·
Session controls
·
Leave room
Create Room
"Can I start one?"
Room details
→
Tags & banner
→
Timer default
→
Mic / cam setup
→
Room created
↳
Password / open
·
Language
·
Invite link
·
Music · Chat
Profile
"What's my record?"
View profile
→
Edit profile
→
Statistics
→
Room history
↳
Profile image
·
Subject / edu
·
Status
·
Streaks
Social
"How am I doing?"
Community feed
→
Friends list
→
Leaderboard
↳
Add friend
·
View profile
·
Own rank
·
Global ranks
Calendar
"What's coming up?"
Timelines
→
Exam schedules
→
Reminders
→
Group schedules
↳
Events
·
Notifications
·
Goals
Settings
"How does this work for me?"
Appearance
→
Notifications
→
Study material
→
Support
↳
Dark / light theme
·
Language
·
AI chatbot
·
Log out
Solid node = primary screen
↳depth marker
02 Lo-fi Sketches

The first sketches tested the full path before visual design: onboarding, room discovery, pre-join confidence, live presence, and the supporting tabs around it.

Hand-drawn lo-fi sketches for all 18 Nest screens
03 Lo-fi Screens

The wireframes locked the hierarchy: room first, proof second, controls last. At this stage, the goal was to judge the product logic without colour, polish, or interface styling carrying the idea.

04 Design System

The visual system turned the structure into a calm public-room interface: dark surfaces for focus, live cues for confidence, and controls that make camera use optional rather than performative.

The system had one belief: the room should feel alive without making students feel watched. Green is used as presence, not achievement. Dark surfaces make the interface feel like a room to settle into, not a dashboard to manage. Camera-off by default keeps accountability social without turning study into performance.

01 — Foundations
Background
#070C15
Surface 1
#111927
Surface 2
#1A2438
Accent
#4D8BFF
Live
#4ADE80
Friction
#5B2C27
02 — Typefaces & Surfaces
Aa
Headline · Manrope
Join Rooms
Title · Manrope 700
45 inside right now
Body · Manrope 500
App background recedes
Room surface primary content
Interactive surface actions / controls
03 — Interface Primitives
Buttons
Primary Secondary Walk in →
Search
Search rooms
Bottom Navigation
Tags & Live States
Live JEE Main Chemistry 90 min
Icon Actions
+ ↑ ◊ ×
Presence
AY JK SI +42
04 — Core Component
Live
JEE Main Chemistry
JEE Aspirants — Focused Chemistry Hour
AY JK SI +42
45 inside
Walk in →
Status

Live state is the first trust cue. It answers whether the room is active before the student reads any detail.

Proof

Avatar stacks and inside-counts make strangers feel less anonymous without requiring profiles to be heavy.

Action

The CTA says “Walk in” instead of “Join” to make entry feel low-commitment and reversible.

05 — States

Live room

Active, populated, ready to enter.

Waiting

Room exists, but social proof is thin.

Camera off

A valid stance, not a warning.

Full room

Blocked action with a useful next step.

Empty room

Set expectation before asking commitment.

Active session

Timer, presence, and quiet controls.

06 — Assembly Rules
Room card Status + subject + social proof + duration + action.
Pre-join Identity + camera choice + confidence cues + low-friction entry.
Live room Timer + people presence + optional camera + quiet controls.
Nest study room interface shown on a tablet in a real study desk environment.
// 06 Key Screens

One screen carries the whole argument.

The rest support it. So this section shows the core screens without making you click through the whole product.

In-session - the timer is the product.

The room is already live. The interface makes time, presence, and a light social count do the work that cameras and host controls usually do.

01
The timer is the only hero.
2:47:31. Everything else is ambient. Read at a glance: this room is serious, and people have stayed in it.
02
12 on. 33 focused.
Evidence of others, no one's face required. The accountability is collective - present, never watching you specifically.
03
No host. No lobby. No history.
Walk in, walk out. The room does not remember you, which is exactly what makes it easy to enter.

Join Rooms - the group chat disappears.

The room list answers the old question before the student asks it: who is already studying, and where can I enter now?

01
Live rooms lead.
Availability is the first object on the screen. The student does not negotiate a start time; they choose a live room.
02
Social proof replaces coordination.
The avatar stack and the count do the work a group chat used to do. Forty-five people have already decided for you.
03
Tags make strangers legible.
JEE, Chemistry, Board. The room feels specific enough to trust without becoming a scheduled class.

Pre-join - privacy is stated before entry.

The camera decision is not buried in settings. Nest says it out loud before the student joins, which turns privacy into a default rather than an apology.

01
Choice comes before pressure.
The student decides how visible they want to be before entering the room, not after everyone is already there.
02
Camera off is named, not hidden.
The copy makes the product stance clear: being present does not require performing on video.
03
The room remains easy to enter.
The controls are explicit, but the path is still short. Setup protects focus without becoming the new friction.

A curated cross-section.The ones that tell the story.

// 07 Reflection

What changed.
What didn't.

What worked

Social presence beat social performance.

The biggest shift was realising that Nest did not need to become more social. It needed to become socially present without becoming performative. The danger was not only loneliness; it was overcorrecting into a room that felt watched. That changed the interface direction: camera-off by default, quiet presence signals, visible room activity, and fewer features that asked students to perform.

Camera-optional became a stance, not a setting.

Putting the choice in the pre-join screen, the controls, and the room detail - rather than one buried toggle - turned a feature into the product's position on what studying should feel like.

Still unfinished

The cold-start problem.

A public room with three people in it is worse than no room. The whole model depends on density - enough students online at once for rooms to feel alive. Design can't solve that alone; it needs seeding, probably educator-hosted daily rooms, before organic activity sustains itself.

The store assumes a mainstream student.

JEE chemistry, board papers, physics notes - it works for the 80%. A design student, a law aspirant, anyone non-STEM finds nothing. Nest claims to be for all students; a section of it doesn't yet deliver on that.

What comes next

The next version isn't more screens. It's one real room, real strangers, and watching whether anyone stays.

Everything here rests on the bet from section 03 - that strangers can carry the accountability friends couldn't. I designed for it. I haven't proven it. The test is a single seeded session with students who don't know each other, and one number to watch: how long the second person stays after the first one leaves.

More work

Continue exploring